JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 1, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Hipolito Padilla Oviedo Vs. Yira Consejo Superior De La Judicatura

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación para el caso por cuanto las decisiones del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura Sala Disciplinaria se profieren en Sala Plena
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó a la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibagué que sin más dilaciones, decida lo que corresponda en la acción de tutela de la referencia, toda vez que esta corporación que de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el numeral 2º del numeral 1 del Decreto Reglamentario 1382 de 2000, no sólo es competente para conocer de la acción interpuesta contra ese despacho judicial sino que también lo es respecto de las autoridades del orden nacional accionadas, de conformidad con los incisos primero y quinto del numeral 1º del Art. 1 ídem.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ORDENAR a la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibague que sin mas dilaciones, decida lo que corresponda en la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.